Classroom Discourse as a Socio-Linguistic Ecosystem: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Indigenous Language Marginalisation and Linguistic Sustainability in Sindhi Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdss.2026.05.4.820Keywords:
Classroom discourse, Critical Discourse Analysis, Linguistic sustainability, Multilingual education, Language ideology, Sindhi, Indigenous language marginalisationAbstract
Classroom discourse is a complex socio-linguistic field where language options, involvement and institutional authority are negotiated in day-to-day pedagogical activities. The methodology adopted in this study is Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as developed by Fairclough for analysing the marginalization of indigenous language Sindhi in the multilingual classrooms in spite of its cultural importance. The qualitative research, based on audio-visual recordings of six classroom sessions, transcripts, and field observations from a public sector girls' degree college in Hyderabad, Sindh, shows three interrelated patterns: pupil utterances are limited to the teacher's initiative, learners who are Sindhi dominant cannot be central to the formal response when it is in Urdu or English, and Sindhi is used only in the informal support and not the academic explanation. These findings indicate that linguistic sustainability cannot solely be a policy problem, but one that is dependent on the everyday interactional choices that legitimate or marginalize indigenous languages. This study can provide the contribution to language teaching by making a direct connection between classroom discourse practices and the vitality of indigenous languages and by promoting inclusive multilingual approaches that view students' full linguistic systems as a resource for learning.
Downloads
References
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 103–115.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Garcia, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hornberger, N. H. (2015). Can schools save indigenous languages? Language and Education, 29(3), 1–15.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
May, S. (2012). Language and minority rights. Routledge.
Ochs, E. (1999). Socialization through language and interaction. Journal of Child Language, 26(3), 681–696.
Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. Routledge.
Rahman, T. (2010). Language policy, identity and education in Pakistan. Oxford University Press.
Siddiqui, S. (2019). Education, language and power in Pakistan. Oxford University Press.
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford University Press.
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report: Inclusion and education. UNESCO Publishing.
van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schieffrin, D. Tannen, & D. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352–371). Blackwell.
van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Society and discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Walsh, S. (2013). Classroom discourse and teacher development. Edinburgh University Press.
Woolard, K. A., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 55–82.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pir Suhail Ahmed Sarhandi, Moomal Seelro, Majid Hussain Buledi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Under the Creative Common Attribution (CC-BY 4.0) license, authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.





