Impact of Regime Changes in Afghanistan on Pakistan’s Trade: A Gravity Estimation

Sehrish khan; abdul muteen

doi:10.54938/ijemd-ss.2026.05.6.915

Authors

Sehrish khan Women University of Bagh ajk
abdul muteen Women University of Bagh ajk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemd-ss.2026.05.6.915

Keywords:

Regime change, Bilateral trade, Gravity model, Pakistan-Afghanistan trade, Political stability

Abstract

This study explores how regime changes in Afghanistan on Pakistan's trade between 1980 and 2021. It utilizes panel data covering annual exports, imports for Pakistan and its 248 trading partners, including Afghanistan. Employing gravity estimation techniques like OLS and PPML, the research focuses on estimating bilateral trade between Pakistan and Afghanistan, with regime transitions in Afghanistan as the primary variable of interest. The results from OLS estimation highlight significant insights, particularly in models 1, 2, and 3, where key independent variables such as Russian reinvasion, rebellion, Taliban era, Karzai era, and Ghani era have treated as dummy variables. Notably, the coefficient for Russian reinvasion consistently shows positive and significant effects across all models, indicating increases in exports, imports, and trade associated with rises in Russian reinvasion. Similarly, positive coefficients have observed for the Taliban era and the Karzai era, suggesting varying increases in trade volumes during these periods. Conversely, the Ghani era coefficient demonstrates negative effects on exports, imports, and trade, implying a decline in trade volumes during this period. Furthermore, factors like GDP, distance, contiguity, official language, ethno-linguistic ties, and colonial history emerge as significant determinants of bilateral trade flows, with higher GDP and proximity positively impacting trade while greater distance and linguistic differences exert negative effects. The robustness test using the PPML method confirms the significance of these factors, emphasizing the crucial role of stable political environments in fostering robust trade relations. With strong model fits and consistent findings with previous research, this study provides valuable insights into the complexities of international trade dynamics and highlights the importance of political stability in promoting trade.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Abbas, S., & Waheed, A. (2015). Pakistan's Global Trade Potential: A Gravity Model Approach. Global Business Review, 20(6), 1361–1371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919848936

[2] Abbas, S., & Waheed, A. (2019). Pakistan‘s Global Trade Potential: A Gravity Model Approach. Global Business Review, 20(6), 1361–1371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919848936

[3] Agreements and International Trade Flow of Pakistan: A Gravity Modeling Approach Free. An empirical analysis of Pakistan’s bilateral trade and trade potential with China: A gravity model approach. (2016). 271–285.

[4] Atabaevich, A. P., & Bin, L. (2017). An Empirical Analysis of Bilateral Trade, 11, 260–273.

[5] Choudhri, E., Marasco, A., & Nabi, I. (2017). Pakistan’s international trade expansion towards. January.

[6] Dilanchiev, A. (2012). Empirical Analysis of Georgian Trade Pattern: Gravity Model, 1(1), 75–78.

[7] Eshetu, A. (2012). Bilateral trade between Ethiopia and Sudan: Does FTA.

[8] Fatima, K. (2019). Factors affecting the bilateral trade of Pakistan with major trading partners, 1(1), 19–28.

[9] Fetahi-Vehapi, M., Sadiku, L., & Petkovski, M. (2015). Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Trade.

[10] Fountas, S., & Aristotelous, K. (2005). The Impact of the Exchange Rate Regime on Exports.

[11] Ganbaatar, B., Huang, J., Shuai, C., Nawaz, A., & Ali, M. (2021). Empirical analysis of factors affecting the bilateral trade between Mongolia and China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(7), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074051

[12] Gul, N., & Yasin, H. M. (2011). The Trade Potential of Pakistan: An Application of the Gravity Model. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 16(1), 23–62. https://doi.org/10.35536/lje.2011.v16.i1.a2

[13] Haynes, S. E., Hutchison, M. M., & Mikesell, R. F. (2015). Empirical Analysis of Pakistan’s Agriculture Trade with China: Complementarity or Competition? http://www.pide.org.pk

[14] Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., Hui, Z., & Arshad, H. (2018). An empirical analysis of Pakistan‘s bilateral trade and trade potential with China: A gravity model approach. Cogent Economics and Finance, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1504409

[15] Irshad, M. S., & Xin, Q. (2014). A new perspective of the China-ASEAN free trade area and the story of top ten products. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(18), 1–8.

[16] Islam, F., Tiwari, A. K., & Shahbaz, M. (2016). Indo-US Bilateral Trade: An.

[17] Jan, W. U., & Shah, M. (2019). A Gravity Model Approach towards Pakistan‘s Bilateral Trade with SAARC Countries. Comparative.

[18] Jan, W. U., & Shah, M. (2020). A panel analysis of trade gravity between Pakistan and South Asian countries. Comparative Economic Research, 3(4), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.23.34

[19] Kang, J., & Yoon, J. (2020). Empirical Analysis on the Current Status and the Development of Bilateral Trade according to the Promotion of Korea-Japan FTA, 6(9), 47–62.

[20] Kumar, S. R., Sangeetha, P., & Kathirvel, K. (2020). An Empirical Study on Bilateral Trade Relations between India and China: An Overview, 8(11), 30–39.

[21] Luqman, A. O., Aznin, N., Bakar, A., Aziz, A., & Izraf, M. (2016). The Gravity Model Approach: An Application on the ECOWAS Trading Bloc, 11(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1515/jeb-2016-0005

[22] Malik, S. (2012). The Structure and Behavior of Pakistan’s Imports from Selected Asian Countries: An Application of.

[23] Mikesell, R. F. (2015). Bilateral Trade and the Yen-Dollar U.S.-Japanese Exchange Rate: An Empirical.

[24] Muteen, A. (2022). Conflicts, Political Distance and Import Volume of Pakistan, a Gravity Model Estimation, 4(2), 451–464.

[25] Nigar. (n.d.). An Openness on Economic Growth: An Evidence for South East European Countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 19(15), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00004-0

[26] OECD. (2021). Fostering Economic Resilience in a world of Open and Integrated Markets. OECD report to the G7.

[27] Qayyum, U., & Nigar, N. (n.d.). PIDE Working Papers.

[28] Rahim, S. A. (2018). Afghanistan’s Dependence on Pakistan: Trade, Transit and the Cost of Being Landlocked.

[29] Sawhney, U., & Kiran, T. (2019). Bilateral Trade among Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa Economies: An Empirical Analysis. Millennial Asia, 10(2), 204–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/097639961985372

[30] Skooee, M. O. B. A., & Heema, J. E. C. (2009). Short-run and long-run effects of currency depreciation on the bilateral trade balance between Pakistan and her major trading partners.

[31] Sohail, F., Sohail, A., Wang, W., & He, X. (2021). An Empirical Study of Bilateral Trade in Egypt: Gravity Model Approach (2000-2018). Open Journal of.

[32] Sýkorová, S. (2008). The Impact of International Trade on Economic Growth: TANZANIA. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 16(5), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aop.164

[33] Tebekew, W. (2014). A Panel Data Analysis for Bilateral Trade of Ethiopia and East African Community Countries: The Gravity Model Approach.

[34] Ullah, S., Kiani, A. K., & Imran, M. (2019). Pakistan‘s Trade and Trading Partners Using Gravity Model: A Static and Dynamic Panel Data. Jinnah Business Review, 7(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.53369/nbne4722

[35] Wahyudi, S. T., & Anggita, R. S. (2015). The gravity model of Indonesian bilateral trade, 1(2), 153–156.