Financial Corruption and the Role of E-Government

Authors

  • Riaz Ahmed University of Turbat, Kech, Balochistan, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Mushtaq University of Turbat, Kech, Balochistan, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Waris University of Turbat, Kech, Balochistan, Pakistan , Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Penang, Malaysia
  • Abdul Majid Nasir University of Turbat, Kech, Balochistan, Pakistan
  • Rehmat Ullah University of Turbat, Kech, Balochistan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemd-ss.2026.05.6.889

Keywords:

Transparency, Accountability, Corruption, E-government, Audit quality

Abstract

Corruption distorts the legitimacy and public trust in government institutions, which weakens the rule of law, impairs public financing, discourages domestic and foreign trade, slows down economic progress, and raises poverty. The aim of the study is to investigate the impact of transparency, accountability, and audit institutions on financial corruption in the public sector of Balochistan, and, most importantly, e-government is integrated as a moderating variable. In Balochistan, the public sector is active and contributes to almost every sphere of social life. However, this sector is facing huge challenges of corruption in various departments, which could threaten its sustainability and socio-economic development. In such situations, the public sector needs to implement appropriate strategies such as transparency and accountability to enhance organizational efficiency and effectiveness, which help fight against corruption. Audit quality also becomes central to curbing financial corruption in the public sector. These institutions create an atmosphere of transparency and accountability that essentially contributes to detecting and significantly preventing financial corruption. Applying principal-agent theory helps to better understand the relationship between government (as agent) and citizens (as principals). This study applies a quantitative research approach to collect data from respondents. The data were collected from respondents working in the public sector as finance and accounting managers through a survey questionnaire. The results suggest that accountability and audit quality significantly affect financial corruption. In addition, the findings substantiate that audit quality is the strongest determinant in fighting corruption. Furthermore, e-government moderates the relationship between audit quality and financial corruption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Abelson, J., Gauvin, F.-P., MacKinnon, M. P., & Watling, J. (2004). Transparency, trust and citizen engagement: What Canadians are saying about accountability. Canadian Policy Research Networks.

[2] Achjari, D. (2004). Partial Least Squares: Another method of structural equation modelling analysis. Journal of Economic and Business Indonesia, 19(3), 238–248.

[3] Adeyemi, S. B., Okpala, O., & Dabor, E. L. (2012). Factors affecting audit quality in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(20), 198–209.

[4] Adhikari, P., & Mellemvik, F. (2011). The rise and fall of accruals: a case of Nepalese central government. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 1(2), 123–143.

[5] Ahmed, M. (2018). The economics and politics of China- Pakistan economic corridor and Balochistan. Regional Studies, 36(2), 71–111.

[6] Ahmed, M., & Hassan, M. (2016). Real unemployment in Balochistan, Pakistan: Context, issues and way forward. Pakistan Vision, 21(2).

[7] Aidt, T., Dutta, J., & Sena, V. (2008). Governance regimes, corruption and growth: Theo-ry and evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36(2), 195–220.

[8] Al-Khaddash, H., Al-Nawas, R., & Ramadan, A. (2013). Factors affecting the quality of auditing: The case of Jordanian commercial banks. International Journal of Business And Social Science, 4(11), 206–222.

[9] Ali Shatnawi, H. (2019). Impact of e-government in reducing administrative and financial corruption in Jordan - Ministry of finance (Study case). American Journal of Operations Management and Information Systems, 4(4), 124–131.

[10] Altamirano, G. D. (2007). The impact of the inter-American convention against corrup-tion, in University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 38(3), 487–547.

[11] Andersen, T. B. (2009). E-government as an anti-corruption strategy. Information Eco-nomics and Policy, 21(3), 201–210.

[12] Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) ap-proach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Tech-nology Studies, 2(2), 285–309.

[13] Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues. Journal of Eco-nomic Literature, 35(3), 1320–1346.

[14] Bauhr, M., Czibik, Á., Licht, J. de F., & Fazekas, M. (2020). Lights on the shadows of public procurement: Transparency as an antidote to corruption. Governance, 33(3), 1–29.

[15] Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2014). Indignation or resignation: The implications of transpar-ency for societal accountability. Governance, 27(2), 291–320.

[16] Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2012). Digitizing Government interactions with constituents: An historical review of E-Government research in information systems. Journal of the As-sociation for Information Systems, 13(5), 363–394.

[17] Bovens, Mark. (2007). Analyzing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.

[18] Bowler, S., & Karp, J. A. (2004). Politicians, scandals, and trust in government. Political Behavior, 26(3), 271–287.

[19] Bradley, H., & Devadason, R. (2008). Fractured transitions: Young adults’ pathways into contemporary labour markets. Sociology, 42(1), 119–136.

[20] Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2004). Accountability and health systems: Toward conceptual clarity and policy relevance. Health Policy and Planning, 19(6), 371–379.

[21] Brown, E., & Cloke, J. (2004). Neoliberal reform, governance and corruption in the South: Assessing the international anti-corruption crusade. Antipode, 36(2), 272–294.

[22] Brown, J. D. (1996). Testing in language programs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.

[23] Brusca, I., Manes Rossi, F., & Aversano, N. (2018). Accountability and transparency to fight against corruption: An international comparative analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 20(5), 486–504.

[24] Caiden, G., & Caiden, N. (1977). Administrative corruption. Public Administration Re-view, 37(3), 301–309.

[25] Campbell, D. T. (1960). Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, or discriminant validity. American Socialogist, 15(8), 546–553.

[26] Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validity by the multitrait multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(02), 81–105.

[27] Cartier-Bresson, J. (2000). Economics of corruption. Organisation for Economic Coopera-tion and Development. The OECD Observer, (220), 25.

[28] Cox, E. P. (1980). The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: a review. Jour-nal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 407–422.

[29] Cresswell, W. J. (2012). Education research: planning, conduction and evaluating quantita-tive and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

[30] Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Research Design: The Logic of Social Inquiry, 58, 225–238.

[31] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived a set of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quartly, 13(3), 319–340.

[32] De Jong, E., & Bogmans, C. (2011). Does corruption discourage international trade? Eu-ropean Journal of Political Economy, 27(2), 385–398.

[33] DeAngelo, H., & Masulis, R. W. (1980). Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(1), 3–29.

[34] DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Eco-nomics, 3(3), 183–199.

[35] DeCoster, J. (2006). Testing group differences using T-tests, ANOVA, and Nonparamet-ric measures (Issue January 2006).

[36] Dike, V. (2002). Anticorruption league: Corruption in Nigeria, A new paradigm for effec-tive control.

[37] Dipietro, W. R. (2011). The corruption and the quality of auditing standards. Asian Eco-nomic and Financial Review, 1(3), 120–123.

[38] Djankov, S., Porta, R. La, Silanes, F. L., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The Regulation of Entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 1–37.

[39] Fornell, C. G., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unob-servable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

[40] Gbadamosi, G., & Bello, M. (2009). The king’s new clothes in the eyes of the beholder: Developing a measurement csale for attitude towards corruption. 73–78.

[41] George, D., & Mallery, M. (2003). Using SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Allyn & Bacon.

[42] Gold, A. H., Arvind, M., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organiza-tional capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214.

[43] Goodson, S. G., Mory, K. J., & Lapointe, J. R. (2012). Supplemental Guidance : The role of auditing in public sector governance.

[44] Gregory, R. J. (2007). Psychology testing: History, principles, and applications (5th ed.). Ally & Bacon.

[45] Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transpar-ency in trust in government : a cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administra-tion Review, 73(4), 575–586.

[46] Guillamón, M.-D., Bastida, F., & Benito, B. (2011). The determinants of local govern-ment’s financial transparency. Local Government Studies, 37(4), 391–406.

[47] Guo, X., & Tu, W. (2017). Corruption tolerance and its influencing factors—the case of China’s civil servants1. Journal of Chinese Governance, 2(3), 307–328.

[48] Gustavson, M., & Sundström, A. (2016). Organizing the audit society: Does good auditing generate less public sector corruption? Administration and Society, 1–25.

[49] Hair, J., Babin, B. J., & Krey, N. (2017). Covariance-Based Structural Equation Model-ing: Review and Recommendations. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 163–177.

[50] Hair, J., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014b). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Inc.

[51] Hair, J., & Lukas, B. (2014). Marketing research. McGraw Hill Education.

[52] Hair, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM : Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–151.

[53] Hair, J., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.

[54] Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., Ferris, G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., & Bowen, M. G. (2003). Accountability in human resources management. In C. A. Schriesheim, & L. Neider (Eds.), New directions in human resource management. Research in Management series. Greenwich, CT: Information Age. 29–63.

[55] Halter, M. V., Arruda, M. C. C., & Halter, R. B. (2009). Transparency to reduce corrup-tion? Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 373–385.

[56] Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Mohmad Sidek, M. H. (2017). Discriminant validity assess-ment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. Journal of Physics, 890(1), 1–5.

[57] Helm, S., Eggert, A. and Garnefeld, I. (2009). Modelling the impact of corporate reputa-tion on customer satisfaction and loyalty using PLS, in Esposito, V.V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J. and Wang, H. (Eds), Handbook of partial least squares: concepts, methods, and applications, Springer, Berlin.

[58] Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discrimi-nant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.

[59] Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In new challenges to international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277–319.

[60] Islam, R. (2006). Does more transparency go along with better governance? Economics and Politics, 18(2), 121–167.

[61] Iyer, L. S., & R.N, R. (2017). Transparency and effective e-governance: a case of telecen-tres in the Indian state of Karnataka. Transforming Government: People, Process and Poli-cy, 11(4), 506–522.

[62] Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial scale development: Sample size for pilot studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394–400.

[63] Jones, G. W. (1992). The search for local accountability. In S. Leach (Ed.), Strengthening local government in the 1990s. Longman.

[64] Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psy-chometrika, 36(409–426).

[65] Junaidi, I. (2015). 64pc Pakistanis believe corruption rife in govt offices, says survey. Dawn News. https://www.dawn.com/news

[66] Kassem, R., & Higson, A. (2016). External auditors and corporate corruption: Implications for external audit regulators. Current Issues in Audituing, 10(1), 1–10.

[67] Kaufmann, D., & Bellver, A. (2005). Transparenting Transparency: Intial Empirics and Policy Applications. Initial Empirics and Policy Applications.

[68] Keil, M., Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K. K., Saarinen, T., Tuunainen, V., & Wassenaar, A. (2000). A Cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quartly, 24(2), 299–325.

[69] Kumar, R. (2005). Research methodology: A step by step guide for beginners (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

[70] Kurniawati, A. D., & Pratama, Y. M. (2021). The role of government auditing in control-ling the level of corruption in Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 25(1), 54–64.

[71] Lambert-Mogiliansky, A. (2015). Social accountability to contain corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 116, 158–168.

[72] Lapalombara, J. (1994). Structural and institutional aspects of corruption. Social Research, 61(2), 325–350.

[73] Lavrakas, P. (2012). Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods (1st ed.). Sage Publica-tion, Inc.

[74] Lederman, D., Loayza, N., & Soares, R. R. (2005). Accountability and corruption: Politi-cal institutions matter. Economics and Politics, 17(1), 1–35.

[75] Leedy, D. P., & Ormrodx, J. E. (2013). Practical research: planning and design (10th ed.). Pearson Education.

[76] Lewis, B. R., Templeton, G. F., & Byrd, T. A. (2005). A methodology for construct de-velopment in MIS research. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 388-400.

[77] Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross- sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114 – 121.

[78] Liu, J., & Lin, B. (2012). Government auditing and corruption control: Evidence from China’s provincial panel data. China Journal of Accounting Research, 5(2), 163–186.

[79] Lord, K. M. (2006). The perils and promise of global transparency (New York: State Uni-versity of New York Press).

[80] Lowensohn, S., Johnson, L. E., Elder, R. J., & Davies, S. P. (2007). Auditor specializa-tion, perceived audit quality, and audit fees in the local government audit market. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(6), 705–732.

[81] Mason, M. (2020). Transparency, accountability and empowerment in sustainability gov-ernance: a conceptual review. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 22(1), 98–111. h

[82] Masood, A., & Afzal, M. (2016). Determinants of Audit Quality in Pakistan. Journal of Quality and Technology Management, XII(II), 25–49.

[83] Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712.

[84] Meijer, A. (2009). Understanding modern transparency. International Review of Adminis-trative Sciences, 75(2), 255–269.

[85] Melitski, J. (2003). Organizational capacity and e-government performance. Public Per-formance and Management Review, 26, 325−344.

[86] Mendes Vieira, K., Pegoraro, D., & Sâmara Visentini, M. (2020). Perception of active and passive transparency in teaching institutions: Proposal and validation of a questionnaire. Journal of Education and Research in Accounting, 14(1), 34–55.

[87] Méndez, F., & Sepúlveda, F. (2006). Corruption, growth and political regimes: Cross-country evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(1), 82–98.

[88] Messick, S. (1995). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(4), 5–8.

[89] Park, H., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2011). The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction. International Review of Administrative Sci-ences, 77(2), 254–274.

[90] Paschke, A., Dimancesco, D., Vian, T., Kohler, J. C., & Forte, G. (2018). Increasing transparency and accountability in national pharmaceutical systems. Bull World Health Organ, 96(11), 782–791.

[91] Patel, M., Doku, V., & Tennakoon, L. (2003). Challenges in recruitment of research par-ticipants. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 9.

[92] Peisakhin, L., & Pinto, P. (2010). Is transparency an effective anti-corruption strategy? Evidence from a field experiment in India. Regulation and Governance, 4(3), 261–280.

[93] Pilot, D. F., & Hungler, B. P. (1999). Nursing research: Principles and methods (7th ed.).

[94] Punch, K. F. (2000). Developing effective research proposals. SAGE Publications.

[95] Ramayah, T., Yeap, J., & Ignatius, J. (2013). An empirical inquiry on knowledge sharing among academicians in higher learning institutions. Minerva, 51(2), 131–154.

[96] Reinikka, R., & Svensson, J. (2005). Fighting corruption to improve schooling: Evidence from a newspaper campaign in Uganda. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2–3), 259–267.

[97] Ringle, C. M., Wande, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). Smartpls 3.0. http://www.smartpls.com

[98] Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, S. (2005). Smart PLS 2.0 M3. Hamburg: University of Hamburg. www.smartpls.com

[99] Roscoe, J. T. (1976). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral science, interna-tional series in decision process (Holt (ed.); 2nd ed.). Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

[100] Rose-Ackerman, S. (1975). The economics of corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 4(2), 187–203.

[101] Rose-Ackerman, S. (1996). Democracy and ‘grand’ corruption. International Social Sci-ence Journal, 48(149), 365–380.

[102] Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(2), 179–183.

[103] Sargiacomo, M., Ianni, L., D’Andreamatteo, A., & Servalli, S. (2015). Accounting and the fight against corruption in Italian government procurement: A longitudinal critical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 28, 89–96.

[104] Saxena, S. (2017). Factors influencing perceptions on corruption in public service delivery via egovernment platform. Foresight, 16(6), 628–646.

[105] Schauer, F. (2014). The mixed blessings of financial transparency. Yale Journal on Regu-lation, 31(3), 809–823.

[106] Sekaran, U. (2006). Research method for business: A skill building approach (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[107] Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research method for business: A skill building ap-proach. John Wiley & Son Inc.

[108] Shah, R., & Goldstein, S. M. (2006). Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: looking back and forward. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 148–169.

[109] Shah, S. A. (2016, May). NAB Recovers Rs730m from Balochistan finance secretary’s residence. Dawn News.

[110] Shamshad, A. (2011). Corruption: A social evil in India. Indian Journal of Public Admin-stration, 57(3), 806–817.

[111] Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2009). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617.

[112] Shook, C. L., Ketchen, D. J., Hult, G. T. M., & Kacmar, K. M. (2004). An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research. Strategic Man-agement Journal, 25(4), 397–404.

[113] Svensson, J. (2005). Eight questions about corruption. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 19–42.

[114] Timmons, J. F., & Garfias, F. (2015). Revealed corruption, taxation, and fiscal accounta-bility: Evidence from Brazil. World Development, 70, 13–27.

[115] Urdupoint. (2021, May 5). NAB Balochistan files reference against 21 fisheries depart-ment officials for Rs 1 billion corruption. UrduPoint News.

[116] Veal, A. J. (2006). Research method for leisure and tourism: A practical guide (5th ed.). Pearson.

[117] Vian, T., & Kohler, J. C. (2016). Medicines transparency alliance ( MeTA ): Pathways to transparency , accountability and access. World Health Organization.

[118] Wescott, C. (2003). E-government to combat corruption in the Asia Pacific Region. The 11th International Anti-Corruption Conference, Seoul, Korea, 25–28.

[119] Westen, D., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Quantifying sonstruct validity: Two simple measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 608–618.

[120] Wheeleen, & Hunger. (2002). Corporate governance and social responsibility. Internation-al Journal of Business Administration, 1(2), 14–27.

[121] Williams, C. (2007). Research Methods. Journal of Business & Economic Research, 5(3).

[122] Wood, G., & Haber, J. (1998). Nursing research: methods, critical appraisal, and utilization (15th ed.).

[123] Xie, K. L. (2011). Examining structural relationships among cognitive destination, image, destination personality and behavioural intentions: the case of Beijing. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

[124] Zhang, Z. H. (2000). Implementation of total quality management: An empirical study of Chinese manufacturing firms. University of Groningen, Netherlands.

[125] Zikmund, W. G. (2000). Business research methods (6th ed.). The Dryden Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-01

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Financial Corruption and the Role of E-Government . (2026). International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries: Social Science, 5(6), 169-195. https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemd-ss.2026.05.6.889