Architect-Artist Collaboration in Architectural Design Studios: A Comparative Case Study of Two Experimental Projects

Authors

  • Uzma Kabir COMSATS University Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Sannah Ejaz COMSATS University Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Reema Shaukat Khan COMSATS University Islamabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdss.2026.05.5.852

Keywords:

architect–artist collaboration, architectural design studio, interdisciplinary pedagogy, studio culture, collaborative design, design-build

Abstract

The architectural profession has increasingly shifted from the model of the architect as a singular author toward collaborative and multidisciplinary modes of design. This shift has also created a need to reconsider the architectural design studio as a space where students can encounter and work through different disciplinary approaches to design. This paper examines the collaboration between artists and architects within the architectural design studio through two academic case studies conducted in the Department of Architecture and Design, COMSATS University Islamabad. The first case, A Designed Collaboration, was developed as a fourth-semester design studio in which the artist was integrated into the studio from the planning stage and contributed to a sequence of exercises moving from personal space to house and finally to an urban intervention. The second case, Design Build as a Medium of Healing and Learning, was developed in the third year as a response to the psychological impact of the Army Public School attack and used a design-build process as a means of learning, making, and collective engagement. The study is qualitative and uses textual analysis of project briefs, studio documentation, written reflections, and project descriptions. The cases are examined through roles, entry point, methods, interaction, negotiation, translation, and design transformation. The comparison indicates that multidisciplinary collaboration does not operate through a fixed model. Instead, the role of the artist changes according to the scale, intention, and demands of the project. In the first case, the artist’s role moved from designer to co-creator and eventually to a specialist in representation. In the second, the artist remained closely involved during conceptual and experimental stages, while architectural responsibilities became more prominent during construction and site management. Across both cases, the collaborative model created opportunities for students to question conventional architectural processes, expand their repertoire of design methods, and understand design as a negotiated process between ideas, users, materials, structure, and context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Joseph, A., Kroll, D., Srivastava, A., Sharifi, E., & Datey, A. (2025). Collaboration in architectural design studio pedagogy: A literature review. CoDesign, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2025.2546426

Harry, S., Kaur, P., & Dutta, A. (2025). Evolution of design studio: Past, present and future. International Journal of Research - GRANTHAALAYAH, 13(6), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v13.i6.2025.6239

Vyas, D., van der Veer, G., & Nijholt, A. (2013). Creative practices in the design studio culture: Collaboration and communication. Cognition, Technology and Work, 15(4), 415–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-012-0232-9

Gregory, A. (2014). Re-thinking design studio pedagogy: Collaboration between architecture and the allied disciplines. In Beyond architecture: New intersections & connections: Proceedings of the 2014 ARCC/EAAE International Conference on Architectural Research (pp. 13–22). Architectural Research Centers Consortium.

Uludağ, Z. (2016). Re-thinking art and architecture: An interdisciplinary experience. In Z. Uludağ & G. Güleç (Eds.), Rethinking art architecture: A challenging interdisciplinary ground (pp. 2–11). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.

Mazalán, P., Ebringerová, P., & Hronský, M. (2025). Fine art projects in architectural education: A tool for socio-critical reflection. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 23(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.61544/VWCK4333

Scopa, K. (2003). The development of strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration from within the visual arts [Doctoral thesis, The Robert Gordon University].

Lehmann, S. (2007). Hidden in the urban fabric: Art + architecture – A case study of collaboration in interdisciplinary contexts. In Proceedings of the 10th Generative Art Conference (pp. 255–261).

Columbano, A. (2015). The studio, the architect, the post-studio, and the artist. Charrette:project, 2(1), 69–79.

Hasirci, D., Rolla, S., Edes, Z., & Anal, S. (2020). Designing an archaeology centre for students. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v7i1.4861

Wojtowicz-Jankowska, D., Gil, E., & Belter, Z. (2024). Designing learning spaces through international and interdisciplinary collaborative design studio: The case of engineer architects and pedagogic students. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 22(3), 90–96.

Jamil, S., Farid, F., & Saeed, G. (2026). Sharing lives in architecture design studio culture: Dialogue on experimental pedagogy. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 10(1), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2026(10-I)15

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Uzma Kabir, Sannah Ejaz, & Reema Shaukat Khan. (2026). Architect-Artist Collaboration in Architectural Design Studios: A Comparative Case Study of Two Experimental Projects. International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries: Social Science, 5(5), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdss.2026.05.5.852

Issue

Section

Research Article