Institutional Legitimacy as the Missing Middle: Analysis of a Mediated Framework for Post-Merger Transitions in South Asia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdss.2026.05.5.851Keywords:
Governance-development nexus, Institutional legitimacy, institutional trust, Peacebuilding, Post-merger transition, Institutional ReformAbstract
Across South Asia, institutional reforms in conflict-affected regions raise a recurring question: how does the extension of formal authority contribute to locally accepted governance and durable peace? It is especially relevant in the context of Pakistan's former federally administered tribal areas which are now part of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province since 2018. Within this transition, South Waziristan provides a setting shaped by conflict, displacement, overlapping authorities and incomplete administrative consolidation. The article explores how institutional legitimacy may link governance and development interventions with peacebuilding in post-merger context. It constructs a framework from a purposive integrative review and conceptual theory synthesis that considers legitimacy as recognition of the rightful authority, trust as expectations of future institutional conduct and lived appraisal as assessments of specific institutional encounters. Governance mechanisms and development interventions are treated as distinct but potentially interacting reform inputs. Their effects on peacebuilding are proposed to operate partly through institutional legitimacy, with trust and lived appraisal forming parallel intervening pathways. The framework also allows for direct effects and reciprocal relationships.
South Waziristan has been used as a contextual plausibility illustration, complemented by mechanism-specific insights from other conflict affected regions like Bougainville, Sierra Leone and Liberia. These illustrations do not establish causal effects or validate the proposed sequence. Framework provides an approach to problem diagnosis that can help differentiate delivery problems, accepted authority, institutional reliability and everyday treatment. It proposes that the dimensions should be analyzed in post-merger assessment, in addition to changes in grievance, cooperation and non-violent conflict management. The article proposes that institutional legitimacy may conditionally mediate the relationship between governance and development interventions and peacebuilding. The strength and direction of these relationships remain open to empirical examination.
Downloads
References
Adcock, R., & Collier, D. (2001). Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401003100
Albrecht, P., & Moe, L. W. (2015). The simultaneity of authority in hybrid orders. Peacebuilding, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2014.928551
Blair, R. A. (2022). Civil war and citizens’ demand for the state: An empirical test of Hobbesian theory. British Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 1748–1768. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000885
Boege, V. (2014). Vying for legitimacy in post-conflict situations: The Bougainville case. Peacebuilding, 2(3), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2014.887616
Boege, V., Brown, A., Clements, K., & Nolan, A. (2009). Building peace and political community in hybrid political orders. International Peacekeeping, 16(5), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533310903303248
Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2005). Rebuilding governance in failed states and post-conflict societies: Core concepts and cross-cutting themes. Public Administration and Development, 25(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.352
Brinkerhoff, D. W., Wetterberg, A., & Dunn, S. (2012). Service delivery and legitimacy in fragile and conflict-affected states: Evidence from water services in Iraq. Public Management Review, 14(2), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.657958
Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), 823–830. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429
Constitution (Twenty-fifth Amendment) Act, 2018, Act No. XXXVII of 2018, The Gazette of Pakistan, Extraordinary, Part I, 713–716 (2018).
Dawar, A. I., & Farias Ferreira, M. (2021). New winners and losers in North Waziristan: Understanding tensions between top-down projects and local knowledge in the post-conflict setting (2015–2019). Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1), Article 1909209. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1909209
Dawar, A. I., & Ferreira, M. F. (2021). ‘State-security first’ and the militarization of development: Local perceptions on post-conflict reconstruction policies in Pakistan’s tribal areas (2015–2019). Forum for Development Studies, 48(2), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2021.1893808
Donais, T. (2009). Empowerment or imposition? Dilemmas of local ownership in post-conflict peacebuilding processes. Peace & Change, 34(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0130.2009.00531.x
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336900600301
Galtung, J. (2010). Peace studies and conflict resolution: The need for trans disciplinarity. Transcultural Psychiatry, 47(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461510362041
Gilley, B. (2006). The determinants of state legitimacy: Results for 72 countries. International Political Science Review, 27(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512106058634
Hettne, B. (2010). Development and security: Origins and future. Security Dialogue, 41(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010609357040
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
Khan, G., Faiz, J., Khan, A., & Ahmad, M. (2023). The war on terror and its implications on the social life of the people of South Waziristan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa–Pakistan. Human Nature Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.71016/hnjss/dkvy8c90
Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. United States Institute of Peace Press.
Levi, M., Sacks, A., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Conceptualizing legitimacy, measuring legitimating beliefs. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209338797
Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. P. (2013). The local turn in peace building: A critical agenda for peace. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 763–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.800750
Mahsud, M. I. (2024). The emergence of nonviolent nationalist movement among the tribes of Waziristan in Pakistan. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2333084. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2333084
Makki, M., & Iftikhar, W. (2022). Transformation in political economy of post-conflict North Waziristan, Pakistan. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 57(3), 497–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096211021866
Makki, M., & Iftikhar, W. (2023). The security-development nexus in post-conflict North Waziristan: Development initiatives and their implications for sustainable peace. Mankind Quarterly, 64(1), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.46469/mq.2023.64.1.8
Mcloughlin, C. (2015). When does service delivery improve the legitimacy of a fragile or conflict-affected state? Governance, 28(3), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12091
Millar, G. (2014). Disaggregating hybridity: Why hybrid institutions do not produce predictable experiences of peace. Journal of Peace Research, 51(4), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343313519465
Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x
Siroky, D., Warner, C. M., Filip-Crawford, G., Berlin, A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2020). Grievances and rebellion: Comparing relative deprivation and horizontal inequality. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 37(6), 694–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894220906372
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Stern, M., & Öjendal, J. (2010). Mapping the security-development nexus: Conflict, complexity, cacophony, convergence? Security Dialogue, 41(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010609357041
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1j66769
Wazir, A., Badshah, I., Shah, Z. A., & Rahim, U. (2023). Tuu Karrai Spi: Deconstructing Aman Committees and life in South Waziristan. Critical Asian Studies, 55(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2023.2186907
Walton, O. (2025). Understanding the relationship between social welfare and conflict in the MENA region. Global Social Policy, 25(3), 539–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181251348870
World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-2094-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Khuram Navid Hasan Malik , Noor Ilahi, Qasim Ali Shah, Farrukh Waheed Hassan Malik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Under the Creative Common Attribution (CC-BY 4.0) license, authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
