Artificial Intelligence, Fintech, and Green Investment: Examining the Role of AI-Driven Climate-Risk Assessment in Sustainable Financial Decision-Making

Authors

  • Sarah Nawazish Imperial College of business studies
  • Serish Umer Department of Economics, The Women University, Multan Pakistan
  • Tahira Jabeen Foundation University, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdss.2026.05.5.824

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, fintech, green finance, climate risk assessment, ESG, sustainable investment, machine learning, NGFS, TCFD, ISSB

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI), financial technology (fintech) and the global sustainability agenda have created a new analytical infrastructure for analyzing climate-related financial risk. The combination of financial technology (fintech), artificial intelligence (AI) and the global sustainability agenda has led to the development of a new analytical infrastructure for the assessment of climate-related financial risk. Financial institutions have embraced machine learning, natural language processing, and geospatial analytics derived from satellite data to measure physical and transition climate risks at a scale and speed that would otherwise be impossible using traditional actuarial and econometric approaches as regulators step up to mandate climate disclosures and investors look for reliable ways to invest trillions of dollars towards decarbonization. This paper reviews the existing literature, regulatory frameworks, and industry practices related to climate-risk assessment tools that can be used for sustainable financial decision making between 2022 and 2026. It establishes a taxonomy of AI applications in physical-risk modelling, transition-risk analysis and scenario analysis, greenwashing identification, credit underwriting and robo-advisory portfolio construction, and maps these applications to an evolving regulatory framework that includes the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), the European Union's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS). Based on data from both developed and emerging markets, the paper proposes that AI is a valuable extension of analytical capacity for sustainable finance, but it also raises new epistemic risks, including from the low-quality or biased climate data used to create AI models, from persistent differences between the different ESG ratings enhanced by AI, from the lack of explainability of the models and the risk of regulatory non-accountability, from the rise of “AI-washing” as a second-order greenwashing risk, from the lack of access to advanced climate-analytics infrastructure in emerging markets, and from the unexamined carbon footprint of the AI systems. The paper ends with a governance design for the responsible use of AI in climate finance and priority fields for further research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Appinventiv. (2026). Unlocking the green fintech revolution via innovative use cases. Appinventiv Insights. https://appinventiv.com/blog/green-fintech/

Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033

Davidescu, A. A., Manta, E. M., Bîrlan, I., & Miler, A.-M. (2026). Detecting greenwashing in ESG disclosure: An NLP-based analysis of Central and Eastern European firms. Sustainability, 18(3), 1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031486

European Central Bank. (2025). Integrating climate risk into the 2025 EU-wide stress test: The effects of climate risks for firms. ECB Macroprudential Bulletin. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/financial-stability-publications/macroprudential-bulletin/html/ecb.mpbu202511_04.en.html

Future Business Journal. (2025). AI-driven sustainable finance: Computational tools, ESG metrics, and global implementation. Future Business Journal. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00610-x

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE). (2026). Central bank climate stress testing. ICE Insights. https://www.ice.com/insights/sustainable-finance/central-bank-climate-stress-testing

International Sustainable Development Observatory (ISDO). (2025). Sustainable finance and AI: ESG risk assessment with machine learning. https://isdo.ch/sustainable-finance-and-ai-esg-risk-assessment-with-machine-learning/

Ji, Q., Guo, K., Zhang, D., et al. (2025). AI-driven climate finance research: Current status and future prospects. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 83(6), 1412–1425. https://doi.org/10.11676/qxxb2025.20250140

Journal of Environmental Management. (2026). Green or greenwashing? A novel deep learning method integrating multi-source data for ESG greenwashing detection. Journal of Environmental Management, 373, 123740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.123740

Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS). (2025a). Guide to climate scenario analysis for central banks and supervisors (2025 update). https://www.ngfs.net/en/publications-and-statistics/publications/2025-guide-climate-scenario-analysis-central-banks-and-supervisors

Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS). (2025b). NGFS climate scenarios for central banks and supervisors — Phase IV. https://www.ngfs.net/en/publications-and-statistics/publications/ngfs-climate-scenarios-central-banks-and-supervisors-phase-iv

Carbon Tracker Initiative. (2025). New NGFS short-term scenarios for central banks & supervisors. https://carbontracker.org/new-ngfs-short-term-scenarios-for-central-banks-supervisors/

Climate Bonds Initiative. (n.d.). Assessing climate transition risks using scenario analysis and stress testing: Insights for the Reserve Bank of India. https://www.climatebonds.net/

Odipo, et al. cited in: Economies. (2026). AI-driven financial solutions for climate resilience and geopolitical risk mitigation in low- and middle-income countries. Economies, 14(4), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14040134

di Pietro, F., et al. (2026). Artificial intelligence in climate and sustainable finance: A blessing or a curse? Journal of Economic Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.70075

PMC. (2025a). An optimized machine learning framework for predicting and interpreting corporate ESG greenwashing behavior. PMC. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11884703/

PMC. (2025b). ESG rating disagreement and bank loan availability: Evidence from China. PMC. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11703092/

Quotb, A. (2026). ESG ratings disagreement and trading behaviour. European Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.70009

Open Research Europe. (2025). Divergence and aggregation of ESG ratings: A systematic literature review. Open Research Europe, 5, 28. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope

Review of Managerial Science. (2026). Understanding ESG rating divergence: A systematic review and research agenda. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-026-00973-7

ResearchGate. (2025). AI-enabled green fintech for ESG investing and green bond monitoring. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395002872

Springer Nature. (2026a). Artificial intelligence applications for advancing sustainable green finance. Discover Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-02980-w

Springer Nature. (2026b). Artificial intelligence-driven sustainable climate finance decision-making in Ghana's financial sector. Discover Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04407-y

Springer Nature. (2026c). Sustainable investing and the role of AI-driven robo-advisors. In Springer book series. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-18109-1_15

GJESM. (2026). Artificial intelligence-driven financial technology for green finance and environmental sustainability. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management. https://www.gjesm.net/article_735219.html

Intel Market Research. (2026). Robo-advisor for sustainable/ESG investing market insights. https://www.intelmarketresearch.com/robo-advisor-for-sustainableesg-investing-market-44436

arXiv. (2024). Integrating AI's carbon footprint into risk management frameworks: Strategies and tools for sustainable compliance in banking sector. arXiv:2410.01818. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.01818

arXiv. (2026). AI-powered sustainable finance: An integrative taxonomy and framework of AI applications for sustainable investment decision-making. arXiv:2605.26076. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.26076

ACL Anthology. (2025a). Detecting greenwashing hints in ESG reports: Linguistic and semantic analysis. Proceedings of SwissText 2025. https://aclanthology.org/2025.swisstext-1.3.pdf

ACL Anthology. (2025b). Towards robust ESG analysis against greenwashing risks. Proceedings of ACL 2025. https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.723.pdf

GRASFI. (2024). ESG reporting divergence. Global Research Alliance for Sustainable Finance and Investment Working Paper. https://sustainablefinancealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GRASFI_2024_paper_44.pdf

PMC. (2025c). Quantitative ESG disclosure and divergence of ESG ratings. PMC. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9388763/

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Sarah Nawazish, Serish Umer, & Tahira Jabeen. (2026). Artificial Intelligence, Fintech, and Green Investment: Examining the Role of AI-Driven Climate-Risk Assessment in Sustainable Financial Decision-Making. International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries: Social Science, 5(5), 196–223. https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdss.2026.05.5.824

Issue

Section

Research Article