Willingness to Pay for Solar Home Systems in Faisalabad: An Application of Multitier Framework for Choice Experiment

Authors

  • Moatar Saeed Department of Economics, Govt. College University Faisalabad, Pakistan
  • Imran Qaiser Department of Economics, Govt. College University Faisalabad, Pakistan
  • Nazia Yasmin Department of Economics, Govt. College University Faisalabad, Pakistan
  • Anam Shehzadi Department of Economics, Govt. College University Faisalabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdss.2026.05.3.762

Keywords:

Willingness to Pay, Choice Experiments, Multi-tier Framework, Acceptance of Solar Home Systems

Abstract

Pakistan's high dependency on imported energy and environmental degradation has prompted a shift towards renewable energy sources, notably solar home systems. The study aims to assess the acceptance and willingness to pay for solar home systems in Faisalabad as well as to identify the determinants of solar energy adoption. A conditional logistic model are employed to determine the willingness to pay for a solar home system. The results indicate the total cost, cost of the battery, manufacturing company origin, manufacturing country significantly impact the acceptance of solar home systems (SHSs). A simple logit model is applied to check the determinants of solar home systems. Results showed that house size, exposure to SHSs, awareness about SHSs, and trust plays a significant role in the willingness to adopt SHSs. Conversely, gender, electricity bill, and environmental ethic negatively affect the willingness to adopt.  This study offers valuable suggestions for policies promoting the acceptance of solar home systems. The findings underscore the significance of addressing cost, family status, and awareness as primary barriers to the adoption of solar home system

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, D. Z., Shah, T., Jebran, K., Ali, S., Ali, A., & Ali, A. (2017). Acceptance and willingness to pay for solar home system: Survey evidence from northern area of Pakistan. Energy Reports, 3, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2017.03.002

Akbar, M., Hussain, A., Akbar, A., & Ullah, I. (2021). The dynamic association between healthcare spending, CO₂ emissions, and human development index in OECD countries: Evidence from panel VAR model. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(7), 10470–10489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01066-5

Akella, A. K., Saini, R. P., & Sharma, M. P. (2009). Social, economical and environmental impacts of renewable energy systems. Renewable Energy, 34(2), 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.002

Ali, S., Poulova, P., Akbar, A., Javed, H. M. U., & Danish, M. (2020). Determining the influencing factors in the adoption of solar photovoltaic technology in Pakistan: A decomposed technology acceptance model approach. Economies, 8(4), 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies8040108

Antonanzas-Torres, F., Antonanzas, J., & Blanco-Fernandez, J. (2021). Environmental impact of solar home systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainability, 13(17), 9708. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179708

Bhowmik, C., Bhowmik, S., & Ray, A. (2018). Social acceptance of green energy determinants using principal component analysis. Energy, 160, 1030–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.093

Chen, C., Xu, X., Adams, J., Brannon, J., Li, F., & Walzem, A. (2020). When East meets West: Understanding residents’ home energy management system adoption intention and willingness to pay in Japan and the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 69, 101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101616

De Groote, O., Pepermans, G., & Verboven, F. (2016). Heterogeneity in the adoption of photovoltaic systems in Flanders. Energy Economics, 59, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.07.008

Fritz, M., & Berger, P. D. (2015). Will anybody buy? Logistic regression. In Improving the user experience through practical data analytics (pp. 271–304). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800635-1.00011-2

Hasanuzzaman, M., Zubir, U. S., Ilham, N. I., & Seng Che, H. (2017). Global electricity demand, generation, grid system, and renewable energy policies: A review. WIREs Energy and Environment, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.222

Heng, Y., Lu, C.-L., Yu, L., & Gao, Z. (2020). The heterogeneous preferences for solar energy policies among US households. Energy Policy, 137, 111187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111187

Holmes, T. P., Adamowicz, W. L., & Carlsson, F. (2017). Choice experiments. In P. A. Champ, K. J. Boyle, & T. C. Brown (Eds.), A primer on nonmarket valuation (13, pp. 133–186). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8_5

International Energy Agency. (2021a). Global energy review 2021: Assessing the effects of economic recoveries on global energy demand and CO₂ emissions in 2021. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2021

International Energy Agency. (2021b). World energy outlook 2021. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2021

International Energy Agency. (2022). Renewable energy market update—May 2022: Outlook for 2022 and 2023. https://www.iea.org/reports/renewable-energy-market-update-may-2022

Irfan, M., Hao, Y., Ikram, M., Wu, H., Akram, R., & Rauf, A. (2021). Assessment of the public acceptance and utilization of renewable energy in Pakistan. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.031

Irfan, M., Zhao, Z.-Y., Ahmad, M., & Mukeshimana, M. C. (2019). Solar energy development in Pakistan: Barriers and policy recommendations. Sustainability, 11(4), 1206. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041206

Jan, I., Ullah, W., & Ashfaq, M. (2020). Social acceptability of solar photovoltaic system in Pakistan: Key determinants and policy implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, 123140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123140

Lee, M.-K., Kim, J.-H., & Yoo, S.-H. (2018). Public willingness to pay for increasing photovoltaic power generation: The case of Korea. Sustainability, 10(4), 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041196

Mangham, L. J., Hanson, K., & McPake, B. (2009). How to do (or not to do) … Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. Health Policy and Planning, 24(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czn047

Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan. (2022). Pakistan economic survey 2021–22: Energy. https://www.finance.gov.pk/survey/chapter_22/PES14-ENERGY.pdf

Ministry of Planning, Development & Special Initiatives. (2021). Pakistan energy demand forecast (2021–2030) (IEP Report-1). Government of Pakistan. https://www.pc.gov.pk/uploads/report/IEP_Report_FINAL.pdf

Omer, S. (2020, May 4). Solar is the future, so might as well hurry. Profit by Pakistan Today. https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2020/05/04/solar-is-the-future-so-might-as-well-hurry/

Opiyo, N. N. (2019). Impacts of neighbourhood influence on social acceptance of small solar home systems in rural western Kenya. Energy Research & Social Science, 52, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.01.013

Qureshi, T. M., Ullah, K., & Arentsen, M. J. (2017). Factors responsible for solar PV adoption at household level: A case of Lahore, Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 754–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.020

Rahman, A., Farrok, O., & Haque, M. M. (2022). Environmental impact of renewable energy source based electrical power plants: Solar, wind, hydroelectric, biomass, geothermal, tidal, ocean, and osmotic. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161, 112279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112279

Rahman, S. M., & Ahmad, M. M. (2013). Solar home system (SHS) in rural Bangladesh: Ornamentation or fact of development? Energy Policy, 63, 348–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.041

Scarpa, R., & Willis, K. (2010). Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: Primary and discretionary choice of British households' for micro-generation technologies. Energy Economics, 32(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.004

Solangi, K. H., Saidur, R., Luhur, M. R., Aman, M. M., Badarudin, A., Kazi, S. N., Lwin, T. N. W., Rahim, N. A., & Islam, M. R. (2015). Social acceptance of solar energy in Malaysia: Users' perspective. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17(7), 1975–1986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0920-2

Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325896

The Nation. (2022, July 7). Pakistan needs solar energy. https://nation.com.pk/2022/07/07/pakistan-needs-solar-energy/

Wieczerak, T., Lal, P., Witherell, B., & Oluoch, S. (2022). Public preferences for green infrastructure improvements in Northern New Jersey: A discrete choice experiment approach. SN Social Sciences, 2(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00315-w

Zhang, Y., & Liang, J. (2021). Analysis of the impact of new energy development and utilization on the environment and economic growth. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 781(4), 042041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/781/4/042041

Downloads

Published

2026-08-27

How to Cite

Moatar Saeed, Imran Qaiser, Nazia Yasmin, & Anam Shehzadi. (2026). Willingness to Pay for Solar Home Systems in Faisalabad: An Application of Multitier Framework for Choice Experiment. International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries: Social Science, 5(3), 404–432. https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdss.2026.05.3.762

Issue

Section

Research Article