AI-Based Student Participation and Engagement Analytics Tool for Enhancing Classroom Learning & Engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdss.2026.05.5.756Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Student Engagement, Classroom Analytics, Gamification, Learning Management Systems, Mobile Learning, Educational TechnologyAbstract
Participation and engagement are essential to positive learning outcomes and while participation is important, it is difficult for instructors to assess participation at the individual level in a classroom. The traditional methods are primarily based on manual tracking and data recording, which require significant time and effort. These are subjective procedures and are hard to be followed from the start of the semester until its end. This article introduces a student presentation and engagement analytics solution based on artificial intelligence that captures, analyzes, and properly visualizes interaction data in real time in the students' classroom. The proposed system allows students to engage in classroom activities by participating in the activities through mobile devices responses to questions and assignment submission, while automatically capturing their responses. A gamification reward system is used to get the students to actively participate in the classroom and to motivate them. AI offers live insights to teachers and learners about learning activities, participation and engagement. The proposed approach will make the traditional classroom an interactive learning environment with timely feedback, individualized learning and increased student participation, using data to make learning more interactive and more data driven.
Downloads
References
Ashfaq, O., Sami, A., & Yousaf, H. (2024). Parent-teacher collaboration and its effect on student’s achievement at pre-school level. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 8(2), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2024(8-II)32
Bin Bakheet, T., Alamri, H., & Alshaya, F. (2026). Developing deep learning in science through an adaptive AI-based STEM instructional program: Evidence from sixth-grade classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-026-00630-1
Castillo-Hernández, F. J., Jiménez-Liso, M. R., & Couso, D. (2022). Can we do real inquiry online? Influence of real-time data collection on students’ views of inquiry in an online, multi-site masters’ degree on environmental education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34(3), 608–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09312-7
Chen, X., Xie, H., Qin, S. J., Wang, F. L., & Hou, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence-supported student engagement research: Text mining and systematic analysis. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e70008. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70008
Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., Al Rahmi, W. M., & Al Adwan, A. S. (2025). The effect of AI gamification on students’ engagement and academic achievement in Malaysia: SEM analysis perspectives. IEEE Access, 13, 70791–70810. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3560567
Dawson, S., Bakharia, A., Lockyer, L., & Heathcote, E. (2009). Using learning analytics to support student learning. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ASCILITE Conference (pp. 45–55). Auckland, New Zealand. https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/auckland09/procs/dawson.pdf
González-Pérez, L. I., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Argüelles-Cruz, A. J. (2025). Data-driven learning analytics and artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje, 20, 440–451. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11184165
Hadyaoui, A., & Cheniti-Belcadhi, L. (2024, November). An ontology-driven framework for adaptive and transparent AI-assisted student assessment. In International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 246–267). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-25534-1_11
Haq, I., Haq, R., & Ahmed, M. (2020). Using the ROFSET framework in tracking, measuring and analysing student participation and engagement in class. INTCESS 2020 – 7th International Conference on Education and Social Sciences. https://share.google/6VDMWN4rVyzWCa7eS
Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1961–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09788-z
Kashif, M., Shah, M. S., Fatima, A., Ahmad, S., & Maqbool, A. (2026). Parent–teacher collaboration and classroom engagement of autistic students in Punjab, Pakistan: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study. International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries: Social Science, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdss.2026.05.2.692
Naseer, S., Khan, A., & Ahmad, N. (2026). Artificial intelligence-assisted art education foster student inclusion and engagement: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries: Social Science, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdss.2026.05.1.735
Nazish, S., & Haq, I. (2026). AI-enabled mobile attendance system for higher education: Enhancing accuracy, scalability, student engagement, and academic performance. International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries: Social Science, 5(1), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdss.2026.05.1.685
Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ’12) (pp. 252–254). ACM. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2330601.2330661
Smith, M. K., Jones, F. H. M., Gilbert, S. L., & Wieman, C. E. (2013). The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 618–627. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154
Smith, T. E., Holmes, S. R., Romero, M. E., & Sheridan, S. M. (2022). Evaluating the effects of family–school engagement interventions on parent–teacher relationships: A meta-analysis. School Mental Health, 14(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-022-09510-9
Stausberg, J., Koch, D., Ingenerf, J., & Michaelis, J. (2003). Comparing paper-based with electronic patient records: Lessons learned during a study on diagnosis and procedure codes. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10(5), 470–477. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1290
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sidra Nazish, Izharul Haq

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Under the Creative Common Attribution (CC-BY 4.0) license, authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.





