Teachers' Experiences of Academic Mentoring and Supervision in Public Schools of Quetta

Authors

  • Sarwan Kumar PhD Scholar, Department of Education, Alhamd Islamic University, Quetta
  • Abdul Rahim Associate Professor, Department of International relation, Alhamd Islamic University, Quetta, Pakistan
  • Asma Alvi Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Alhamd Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Shagufta ambreen Head of Department, Department of Education, Alhamd Islamic University, Quetta, Pakistan
  • Mukhtar Bashir Lecturer, Department of Education, University of Gwadar, Gwadar, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdss.2026.05.1.712

Keywords:

academic supervision, teacher mentoring, professional development, reflexive thematic analysis, public schools, Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan

Abstract

Academic supervision and mentoring shape how public-school teachers experience their professional lives, yet little is known about how these processes actually unfold in the specific socio-economic, political, and demographic setting of Quetta, Pakistan. Design: This study adopted a qualitative research design, using reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2021) to analyse the data. Population: The population comprised public-school teachers working at the middle-school level in and around Quetta, Balochistan. Significance: The study addresses a notable gap in the literature on teacher supervision and mentoring in Balochistan and offers context-specific evidence to inform policy and practice in this area. Respondents: Twenty in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty middle-school teachers (twelve female, eight male), drawn from urban, peri-urban, and rural public schools in and around Quetta. Findings: The findings identify six connected themes: (1) the compliance encounter, in which supervision becomes an administrative exercise rather than a pedagogical dialogue; (2) an invisible, informal support network based on peer mentoring where formal induction fails to take place; (3) a system built for the centre, in which distance, gender, and disruption lead to differential access to supervision; (4) categorical invisibility, in which multigrade, inclusive, linguistically diverse, and co-curricular classrooms lie beyond the scope of the supervisory template; (5) material conditions for professional development, such as delayed salary and patronage in staffing; and (6) proof of concept without institutionalization, in which pilots that had demonstrated the efficacy of alternative methods of supervision could not be institutionalized due to a lack of continued government funding. A meta-theme of not being indifferent, just underserved, runs through the six, showing that teachers are not resisting the idea of accountability but only its current, administrative, undifferentiated form. The findings extend developmental and instructional supervision theory to the underexamined context of a provincial South Asian society and offer practical recommendations for policy-making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akram, M., & Malik, S. (2024). Institutional barriers to Teacher mentoring in Pakistani higher education: A qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Higher Education, 30(1), 78–95.

Balochistan Commission on the Status of Women & UN Women Pakistan. (2025). Balochistan gender parity report 2024 [Report]. UN Women Pakistan. https://pakistan.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2025/07/balochistan-gender-parity-report-2024

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2024). Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine: A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG). Palliative Medicine, 38(6), 608–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241234800

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a curriculum for teacher mentoring. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00141

Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2018). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (10th ed.). Pearson.

Hussain, S., Debreli, E., & Farman, M. (2026). Sustainable professional growth through digital mentorship: Evidence from language teachers in low-resource settings. Scientific Reports, 16, Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-29242-5

Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311403323

Kalim, U., & Bibi, S. (2024). Assessing teacher competencies in public schools of Pakistan: A pathway for improving the effectiveness of professional development programs for teachers. SAGE Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241236060

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Nawab, A., & Baig, S. (2024). Teacher professional development in rural Pakistan: Challenges and opportunities. Professional Development in Education, 50(2), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2024.2312345

Nawab, A., & Quraishi, M. (2024). Teachers value PD only if leaders value PD: The role of school leaders in the professional development of teachers in rural Pakistan. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 24(4), 788–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2024.2303688

Rafiq, K., & Ashraf, M. A. (2024). Gender disparities in professional development opportunities for language teachers in Pakistan. Gender and Education, 36(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2024.2312876

Rokhman, F., Usman, H., & Wulandari, T. (2024). Academic supervision practices and instructional improvement: Evidence from public schools. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 5(2), 145–160.

Schweig, J., Wang, E. L., Lee, S., & Mihaly, K. (2025). Teach For Pakistan evaluation: Quantitative and qualitative study findings (Report No. RR-A1870-2). RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1870-2.html

Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J. (2007). Supervision: A redefinition (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Shad Foundation. (2025). Bridging the girls' education gap in rural Pakistan [Web page]. https://shadfoundation.org.pk/girls-education-gap/

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-28

How to Cite

Sarwan Kumar, Abdul Rahim, Asma Alvi, Shagufta ambreen, & Mukhtar Bashir. (2026). Teachers’ Experiences of Academic Mentoring and Supervision in Public Schools of Quetta. International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries: Social Science, 5(1), 100–127. https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdss.2026.05.1.712

Issue

Section

Research Article